But the noise dies and the warriors depart. Military glory alone is insufficient, for the wars end and there must be something to maintain the nation afterward. These two lines also evoke the “tumult and the shouting” of the Jubilee, the gathering of royalty and of military notables from every European nation. The noise of the Jubilee has to die, too, and the cele- brants must depart, and what then? It is a common biblical notion that it is not the proud, the powerful, and the arrogant who are cared for by God, but the humble, the repentant, and the unassuming.
The former are too apt to be tempted into feeling they have no need of God and are there- fore likely to forget Him. The latter cannot forget Him because they have nowhere else to turn. Again: “The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, 0 God, thou wilt not despise” (Psalms 51:17). But what if Great Britain, foolishly vainglorious, at- tempted tasks too great for her, or entered into tasks without careful forethought and planning? The navy, “far-called” (that is, spread thin over the waters of a worldwide empire, too thin) would melt away.
Read more…
He took the city after nine months and destroyed it. It exists to this day as a small coastal city in Lebanon, but no shadow of its former glory remains. After all, there may be some people of Sodom who are righteous. It is the wild overweening pride, the “hubris” of the Jubilee, that makes Kipling uneasy. The behavior is not British in his opinion, but is more suited to other and inferior people (a viewpoint which is itself an example of hubris, of course). Any group that considers itself in a spe- cial relationship to God, or as having a special signifi- cance in history, is likely to lump all other people as Gentiles, as members of the (other) tribes. To Kipling, with his attitude that the British are the modem Israelites and the new-chosen of Cod, all non- British are Gentiles, and therefore inferior beings who know no better than to indulge in vainglorious boast- ings. That the British should do that as well would be shameful.
The agreement, or covenant, by which the Isra- elites became the chosen of God, required that, in ex- change, they obey the Law as delivered to Moses on Mount Sinai. Thus, God says, “Now, therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people” (Exodus 19:5). To be “without the Law,” then, is not to be of the elect. They are not British (Israelite), and therefore they are “lesser breeds. The word means those of the heath, or back- woods, who are unsophisticated and cling to primitive traditions and worship, 18. The trust in force exclusively, without regard to moral justification, is exemplified in a Jingle that became current in Great Britain after the invention of a new and improved machine gun by the American inventor Hiram Stevens Maxim in 1884: Whatever happens, we have got The Maxim-gun, and they have not Ironically enough, even as Kipling wrote, the word “reeking” became obsolete. For six hundred years the chemical explosive used on the battlefield to prooel bullets and balls had been gunpowder. That had produced smoke, soot, and reek- ing odors that fouled the pms, choked the gunners, and obscured the battlefield.
Read more…
Posted by admin on May 12, 2012 in
Some could be metalworkers.
After all, when I am not engaged in doing something, I am thinking about doing something so that the rest of the world recedes. This is a process that is not without serious risk, especially when I am treading the streets of New York. Someone who was aware of my absent-mindedness was my beautiful, blond-haired, blue-eyed daughter, Robyn, who, from an early age, would discuss my peculiarities with her friends, but who loves me anyway. I hope that she has spent much of her life laughing with me, for I do a lot of laughing myself, but I suspect she has spent some of her life laughing at me. One example of my preoccupation took place about a dozen years ago when I was giving a talk at Boston University. I was perfectly well aware that Robyn was attending Boston University at the time and I rather expected to see her in the audience. After the talk, a number of students crowded about me to ask questions and I was answering with great vivacity, as I usually do, and with only the vaguest awareness of my surroundings.
Very casually, I noted a beautiful, blond-haired, blue-eyed young woman standing nearby, but my eyes slid over her without pause. This happened several times, until a vague feeling of having missed something pervaded me. I turned back to the young woman, stared a 132 while as I gathered my otherwise-busy perceptions, and finally said, with a distinct question mark in my voice, “Robyn? He finally recognized me.
Read more…
Posted by admin on May 4, 2012 in
Some could be metalworkers.
An increase of 80 million people in one year means an additional Mexico in a year. That is equivalent to 220,000 new people every day, or one new Lima, Ohio, every time you wake up in the morning. It is also equivalent to 150 additional people every minute or 5 additional people every two seconds. I showed that by 2554 A. I then assumed that every star in the Universe had ten habitable planets and that we could transfer people from planet to planet at will and instantaneously. I then imagined that all the mass in the Universe could be converted into human flesh and blood, and it turned out that if this could be done without limitation, then by 8700 A. Since the birthrate has dropped since 1969, we can calculate the doubling rate right now at once every fifty years. This gives us a little more time.
Obviously, this is far from enough. Do you want to be optimistic and say we can do that fifty years from now? The only question about population that we can ask is how we will stop the population increase. And the answer to that is that either (a) the birthrate will continue to decrease, or (b) the death rate will increase, or (c) both will take place. There are no other alternatives. The feeling on the part of demographers is that by the year 2000 the population will begin to level off and that by 2100 it will reach stability, though by that time the population will have reached some 10 billion, or twice what it is now. Is that a big sigh of relief I hear? What kind of a world will it be by the time population stability is achieved?
Read more…
It strikes the upper atmosphere, smashes into its atoms, and produces speeding secondary radiation. It is this secondary radiation that reaches us, and it is mostly in the form of muons. Here we have a puzzle. The muon can be produced 44 by nuclear reactions in the laboratory, and we can note the length of the path that a muon takes through a detecting device.
After it travels a short distance, its path is converted into one that is typically that of an electron. The conclusion is that a muon is unstable and, after a short period of time, decays into an electron (which is stable). Now, how much distance can a muon travel before it is converted to an electron? That depends on its speed, but even if it travels at the speed of light, the fastest possible, it can only cover a distance of 660 meters (two fifths of a mile) before changing into an electron. Yet the muons are formed many miles high in the atmosphere. How can they possibly survive long enough to reach the surface? Einstein suggested that as velocities increase, lengths in the direction of velocity decrease. At ordinary velocities, which are only a small fraction of the speed of light, the decrease is immeasurably small.
Read more…
Finally, the sliced-off portion of the outer layers would have been subjected to the heat produced by the collision, and when the vapors condensed, those of the volatile elements did so to an unusually small extent. That would explain why the Moon is short of volatile elements and long on glassy remnants. In short, this alternative 4 avoids all the difficulties associated with the other three, and seems to introduce no major difficulties of its own. Slow and inevitable evolutionary solutions appeal to them much more. In 1984, when the idea was advanced again with computer simulations as backup, there was considerable enthusiasm. Pending a closer look at every stage of the supposed impact, astronomers now think they have a way of accounting for the existence of the Moon. He had Earth formed by a glancing collision with a Sun of a smaller but, nevertheless, massive body. He then suggested that the Moon was torn from the Earth, and one would have to assume that he was thinking of the same mechanism.
On the other hand, it makes me aware that there are limits to my “smartness,” and that realization may be healthy for that supposedly swollen ego of mine. If you plan to explain science, you have to have a feel for asking the right question. I asked the right question once, many years ago.
Read more…
And yet with the chance of universal de- struction, there remains no certainty of peace? It is the strongest nuclear power. What could I say? We tried to unite against France, but relied too greativ on Great Britain to feel the absolute need.
We did unite against Great Britain, at last, when we stood alone. There is no enemy from beyond the earth to threaten us with universal defeat and slavery. Is there not miserv? Is there not hunger and disease, hatred and bigotry, and disorder and crime? Has your world changed so much that these things do not exist? What you call a nuclear war would make it too late at once. He said, “You spoke of a war be- tween the states. Are the states still at enmity?
Read more…
Ruth herself must have been pictured in hundreds of illustrations. What great credit was there in marrying her? If a girl like that had fallen at your feet and asked you humbly to do your duty and kindly marry her, you would probably have done it like a shot. Of course she was a Moabite woman, but so what? What does the word “Moabite” mean to you? Are there many Moabites among vour acquaintances? Have vour children been cha-sed bv a bunch of lousv Moahites latelv? Have thev been reducing property values in vour neighbor- hood?
When was the last time vou heard someone sav, “Got to get those rotten Moabites out of here. They just fill un the welfare rolls”? In fact, judging by the way Ruth is drawn, Moa- bites are English aristocrats and their presence would raise property values. The word “Moabite” reallv means “someone of a group that receives from us and deserves from us nothing but hatred and contempt. Reread the story of Ruth and translate “Moabite” to “black” every time you see it. Naomi (imagine) is coming back to the United States with her two black daughters-in-law. No wonder she urges them not to come with her. It is a marvel that Ruth so loved her mother-in-law that she was willing to face a society that hated her unreasoningly and to take the risk of gleaning in the face of leering reapers who could not possibly suppose they need treat her with any consid- eration whatever.
Read more…
Then: “You say that because you think to please me, perhaps. Richer than Great Britain? The time has not been all bliss. In this present century, we have fought war after war overseas.
We have had periods of economic disaster and periods of political corruption. It has not been the best of all possible worlds, but we have sur- vived, and, as we approach the bicentennial, we are the richest and strongest nation on earth. He stirred in his bed and said, “I feel that I would like to walk about.
Read more…
Another large dolphin, the narwhal, up to 5 meters long, is an Arctic animal. The most unusual characteristic of the narwhal is that one tooth on the left side of its Jaw forms a straight, spiral tusk up to 2. The largest truly carnivorous whale is the sperm whale. The male sperm whale can be as long as 20 meters and may weigh as much as 60 tons. It lives largely on giant squid. Still larger whales, like the largest sharks, must cut through the food chain if they are to be supported in any numbers. The largest of all whales (and, indeed, the largest animal that has ever lived) is the blue whale, which can be 30 meters long and weigh 135 tons. It feeds largely on krill, eating 3 tons per dav.
Whales that feed on plankton have fringes of homy plates, up to 3 meters long, extending down from the roof of tile mouth and frayed and brushlike at the end. These, called “baleen” or “whalebone,” trap and strain out the plankton. Whalers, hunting the whale for meat, oil, and whale- bone, ventured into Arctic and Antarctic waters, and a great deal of the early exploration of the polar re- gions was performed by whalers and by those who hunted other sea mammals. The search for whales was ruthless, however, and without any thought for preserving the species. In the eighteenth century, the large baleen whales of the Arctic were reduced to such small numbers that it was simply not worthwhile hunting them anymore. Whaling is now almost entirely confined to the Ant- arctic, where the food supply of the oceans is the rich- est in the world thanks to the Antarctic Convergence.
Read more…